Two PLDI Practice Talks (see description)
Buddhika Chamith and Andrew Kent
This Friday, we will have two practice talks for accepted PLDI papers.
Living on the edge: Rapid-toggling probes with cross modification on x86
Author: Buddhika Chamith
Dynamic probe injection is now a widely used method to de- bug performance in production. Current techniques for dynamic probing of native code, however, rely on an expensive stop-the-world approach: binary changes are made within a safe state of the program—typically in which all the program threads are halted—to ensure that another thread executing the modified code region doesn’t step into a partially modified code. Stop-the-world patching is not scalable. In contrast, low overhead, scalable probes that can be rapidly toggled on and off in-place would open up new use cases for statistical profilers and language implementations, even traditional ahead of time, native code compilers. In this talk I will describe safe cross-modification protocols that mutate x86 code between threads but do not require quiescing threads, resulting in radically lower overheads than existing solutions. A key problem is handling instructions that straddle cache lines. We empirically evaluate existing x86 architectures to derive a safe policy given current processor behavior, and we argue that future architectures should clarify the semantics of instruction fetching to make cheap cross-modification easier and future proof.
Occurrence Typing Modulo Theories
Author: Andrew Kent
We present a new type system combining occurrence typing—a technique previously used to type check programs in dynamically-typed languages such as Racket, Clojure, and JavaScript—with dependent refinement types. We demonstrate that the addition of refinement types allows the integration of arbitrary solver-backed reasoning about logical propositions from external theories. By building on occurrence typing, we can add our enriched type system as a natural extension of Typed Racket, reusing its core while increasing its expressiveness. The result is a well-tested type system with a conservative, decidable core in which types may depend on a small but extensible set of program terms.